
Plastic is a cheap and versatile material, but what about sustainable packaging alternatives? Plastic is the convenient choice for many use cases and many products we use daily are made from plastic, whether it’s our clothes, cars, phones, or kitchenware, plastic is everywhere. In fact, the world produces 400 million tonnes of plastic waste annually. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, many are reducing their plastic use by avoiding products made from or packaged in plastic.
As more sustainable options are introduced, consumers are choosing products that align with their environmental values, passing over other products. This can be a loss for companies as brand loyalty weakens and customer attraction decreases. However, barriers such availability, material strength and versatility, and cost are prohibiting the transition from plastic.
The question remains: Can we effectively replace common packaging materials like plastic with environmentally friendly alternatives that are scalable and cost-effective?
The impact of plastic goes beyond ingestion. Researchers have discovered microplastics in human lungs and the placenta, raising concerns about serious health risks such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Beyond the threat to human health, plastic pollution poses significant dangers to marine life, soil health, and food safety. Additionally, plastic production relies heavily on fossil fuels, releasing harmful greenhouse gasses during extraction, manufacturing, and transportation—further contributing to climate change.
Biodegradable packaging uses materials that break down under natural conditions through temperature, moisture, and microorganisms. Unlike traditional plastics which can take hundreds of years to break down, biodegradable materials (like those used for grocery bags) decompose in a matter of months under the right conditions.
Compostable packaging is a specific type of biodegradable material that uses materials to break down under specific conditions created by composting facilities. They break down into non-toxic components (water, carbon dioxide, and biomass) and within a specific time frame. This degradation in a set time frame and no harmful residues makes compostable products the more environmentally friendly choice.
The materials used to create biodegradable and compostable materials for sustainable packaging alternatives are key to scaling use. A number of innovative solutions are emerging, each with unique properties suited to different types of packaging. Some promising materials include:
One of the most significant challenges for biodegradable and compostable packaging is scalability—how to produce these materials at volumes and costs competitive with traditional plastics. There are several key strategies the CPG industry can implement to transition to sustainable packaging alternatives effectively:
The environmental cost of plastic, particularly single-use plastic packaging, is undeniable. It contributes to massive waste, harms ecosystems, and poses significant health risks. Biodegradable and compostable packaging offers a promising alternative, with innovative materials paving the way for a more sustainable future. However, the challenge remains: Can these alternatives be produced at a scale and cost that rivals traditional plastics?
Companies must take actionable steps to transition to sustainable packaging alternatives:
The environmental impact of plastic, particularly single-use plastic, is undeniable. With packaging being a major contributor to environmental issues and increasingly scrutinized by stakeholders, companies must take the lead in adopting sustainable packaging alternatives. While plastic’s convenience and cost-effectiveness are hard to overlook, an industry-wide effort is essential to drive this transition.
To implement biodegradable and compostable packaging effectively using materials like PLA, mycelium, cellulose, and seaweed, developers must create scalable and cost-efficient options and build the necessary infrastructure to ensure their full environmental benefits. Innovation, government incentives, infrastructure investment, and corporate responsibility will be key for a successful transition.
At the company level, assessing current packaging, collaborating with suppliers to develop practical alternatives, supporting policies that promote sustainability, and educating consumers will position businesses as leaders in the transition. By reducing packaging where possible and innovating for the rest, companies can align with environmental goals and meet growing consumer demand for sustainable practices.
1. How can companies know which sustainable packaging option actually has the lowest carbon footprint?
Understanding which material truly minimizes environmental impact requires a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). While materials like PLA, mycelium, and cellulose all show promise, their carbon performance can vary depending on sourcing, manufacturing, transport, and end-of-life treatment. Conducting LCAs helps companies compare materials across these stages and make data-driven choices.
2. What’s the most effective way to measure the environmental impact of our packaging choices?
The most comprehensive way to measure packaging impact is through an LCA, which quantifies emissions, resource use, and waste from production through disposal. Traditional manual LCAs can be complex and time-intensive, but digital solutions streamline this process. By integrating product and supplier data, CarbonBright enables companies to assess the environmental performance of each packaging design or material choice accurately and efficiently.
3. How can we make sure our sustainable packaging meets new carbon reporting and ESG requirements?
With the introduction of frameworks like the EU’s CSRD and SEC climate disclosure rules, accurate emissions data is essential. Sustainable packaging choices must be backed by transparent, verifiable impact data to comply with these standards. AI-powered platforms help companies align with global sustainability and reporting requirements by providing standardized, audit-ready carbon data across packaging materials and product portfolios, simplifying ESG reporting and regulatory compliance.
4. Is switching to biodegradable or compostable packaging always better for the environment?
Not necessarily. While biodegradable and compostable packaging options reduce plastic pollution, their environmental benefit depends on several factors—such as raw material sourcing, manufacturing energy, and whether local composting infrastructure exists. Some alternatives may even have higher emissions than traditional plastics if not managed properly. Conducting AI-powered LCAs allows companies to assess these trade-offs and identify the packaging options that deliver true sustainability benefits.
5. How can brands prove their packaging changes are truly sustainable to consumers and stakeholders?
Today’s consumers expect transparency and accountability from the brands they support. To build trust, companies must substantiate their sustainability claims with measurable data. Providing verified, science-based insights through automated LCAs, helps brands confidently communicate the carbon savings and environmental benefits of their packaging innovations. This not only strengthens brand reputation but also demonstrates genuine commitment to sustainability goals.